tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 29 06:51:05 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol
Does the book say why they are providing this {no' Hol} introduction and what "dialect" it is? Could this be the ancient language actually spoken by Kahless, Lukara, et al., some 1500 years ago?
--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons
================================================================
From: André Müller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 3:30 AM
I did an analysis of the first page as well. There still were one or two words I didn't get the ta' Hol counterpart for. It's interesting. I've added the no' Hol forms of the words and affixes I could figure out to my own dictionary/database.
I'm fine with a discussion about the no' Hol parts or a list of no' Hol - ta' Hol - DIvI' Hol correspondents.
2011/11/29 De'vID jonpIn <[email protected]>
QeS 'utlh:
> I've deciphered the no' Hol from the prologue to the paq'batlh, and it proves
> to be quite interesting. Am I OK to post about it now, or do people want a
> little more time to work it out for themselves?
jatlhpu' De'vID:
> g'ubat, Dat pag' DyeDyot'qut!
jang Quvar, jatlh:
> I head feared that someone might analyse this and then start to learn
> no'Hol!
QeS 'utlh:
Too late! {{;)
I guess it's okay to post your analysis now. It's been a couple of days already and people who are inclined to try to decipher the {no' Hol} have probably already done so.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol