tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Nov 26 18:22:43 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol

De'vID jonpIn ([email protected])

From: "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 03:22:33 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+ZKQoZ0fDhGeu+xlKqWU4rjwqMOLDAswzResiGDyCSA=; b=HWYSYnI4Kb3I34f3Cl2TOuLGNP5H2xtZ7BNYBMgVqEVwHahmXGihT5D8tjQzIUZH47 IRnRBvYvxjrbhhPJuaeuMAhvvXzHX/RWOEMRxqnFcZPFgYblqRlfzFJ9LC6/5K+sp3LV duEbhklNJQQCHKAGXKTIyb6O1s3lJvFrqkhqY=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
References: <[email protected]>

QeS &#39;utlh:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
I&#39;ve deciphered the no&#39; Hol from the prologue to the paq&#39;batlh, and it proves<br>
to be quite interesting. Am I OK to post about it now, or do people want a<br>
little more time to work it out for themselves?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>g&#39;ubat, Dat pag&#39; DyeDyot&#39;qut!  </div><div> </div></div>-- <br>De&#39;vID<br>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol
  - From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>

References:
- [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol
  - From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: VERBS USED AS NOUNS
Next by Date: [Tlhingan-hol] how to use {nej}?
Previous by thread: [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol
Next by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol
Index(es):