tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 18 11:44:11 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' chorghmaH Soch: <taj noj>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Qov <[email protected]> wrote:
> jatlhtaH 'ungya 'e' QoylaHmo' leSchoH...
vIHarbe'DI' jIlugh. maj.
> qIv pup. DaSpu' lo'be' 'ach 'oy' SIQ 'e'
> 'angmo' Hota'ro' qab bel HoD. meHDaq chegh.
'oy'vammo' nuq ghoj Hota'ro'?
> jatlh 'ungya, "SochHu' , poSchoHpa' Som, lopmeH neH Hu'qa'ta'mo' DeghwI',
> nuHmey qengbe'pu'. pa'DajDaq Hoch nuHDaj tu'lu'."
toH. nuHDaj Suqqa' qen 'e' bot HoD. paDaj 'elrupDI' Hota'ro' Sut neH
vIqelpu'. tlhIngan jIHbe'ba'.
> jatlh Hota'ro', "jItoy'rup, HoD. chay' chora'?"
> "puchpa' yISay'moH. yIruch!" jatlh.
puchpa' lIw'e' Say'nISmoHba'.
> jatlh HoD. "qatlh ghaH DarI'pu'?"
> "chojangbe'mo'," jatlh 'ungya.
napqu'.
> "mughIj. may wanI' 'e' SaHbe'law'mo' ghob Hutlhlaw'. Huj." jatlh HoD.
SuvwI' neH ghaHbe' 'op tlhIngan'e' net SovnIS.
> "Hut tlhIngan may'Duj HoDpu' DaponglaH'a'?"[52]
> [52] Can pong mean "specify the existing name of" in this way? I haven't
> used it this way before.
I don't know for certain that {pong} is correct here, but it doesn't
bother me. However, I'm pretty sure {per} works.
> "ngIq wa' may'Duj HoD vIponglaHbe'." jatlh HoD "vISaHbe'chu'."
<ngIq wa' may'Duj HoD> vIyajchu'be'. chay' qech SIgh <ngIq>?
Dachchugh pImbe'law' mu'tlhegh.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol