tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 06 19:33:17 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Translating TEDTalks
tlhIngan Hol qelqu'bogh TEDtalk DaqonrupDI' HIrI'.
At 18:17 06/02/2011, you wrote:
>If you're like me, you just can't get enough of TEDTalks: You give
>them a few minutes of your time, and you get knowledge and
>inspiration in return.
>TED.com also has interactive transcripts, and a system for
>translating them. Among the languages you can translate into are
>Esperanto, Lojban and - You guessed it! - Klingon. However, thus
>far nobody has actually done a translation into Klingon, which I
>feel is a shame. Of course, it's natural in a way that nobody's
>done so yet: The subject matter of a TEDTalk is usually quite
>esoteric, the talks themselves are filled with jokes and figures of
>speech, and TED's translation guidelines makes it rather difficult
>to translate between two languages with completely different speech
>patterns (as does the very nature of subtitles).
>In other words: A fun challenge! I decided to give Stephen
>Hawking's TEDTalk (
>http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/stephen_hawking_asks_big_questions_about_the_universe.html
>) a go, in part because it seemed doable and in part because I liked
>the idea of translating a speech concerning - among other things -
>the existence of alien lifeforms into an alien language.
>You can check out my translation by going here and selecting
>"Klingon [100%]" from the drop-down menu on the video
>player: http://dotsub.com/view/b27cafe0-10b1-4160-8f56-59f630033228
>
>Now, in order to be fully accepted and show up on TED.com, I need
>another jatlhwI' to sign up as a translator on TED.com and review my
>translation; hail me if you're interested and want instructions on
>how to do so!
>However, even if you don't feel like becoming a TED translator, I'd
>very much appreciate any input you might have on my translation, and
>it wasn't an easy one.
>
>Video title:
>Stephen Hawking asks big questions about the universe
>'u' lubopbogh potlh'a'mey nuD Stephen Hawking
>"Stephen Hawking inspects great important things which are all about
>the universe"
>
>Video description:
>
>In keeping with the theme of TED2008, professor Stephen Hawking asks
>some Big Questions about our universe -- How did the universe begin?
>How did life begin? Are we alone? -- and discusses how we might go
>about answering them.
>
>
>potlh'a'mey bop TED2008. vaj 'u'maj lubopbogh potlh'a'mey nuD
>Stephen Hawking. ghel ghaH: chay' chenpu' 'u'? chay' chenpu' yIn?
>mamob'a'? janglaHmeH mIw Del ghaH.
>
>"TED2008 is all about great important things. So Stephen Hawking
>inspects great important things which are all about our universe. He
>asks: How did the universe form? How did life form? Are we alone? He
>describes a process for being able to answer.
>
>
>There is nothing bigger or older than the universe.
>'u' tIn law' Hoch tIn puS. 'u' qan law' Hoch qan puS.
>"Universe big many all big few. Universe old many all old few."
>
>
>Your questions I would like to talk about are:
>jIghel vIneH,
>"I want to ask:"
>
>One, where did we come from?
>nuqDaq 'oH mungmaj'e'?
>"Our origin is where?"
>
>
>How did the universe come into being?
>
>chay' chenpu' 'u'?
>
>"How did the universe form?"
>[Perhaps qatlh would be more appropriate?]
>
>Are we alone in the universe?
>'u'Daq mamob'a'?
>"In universe we are alone?"
>
>Is there alien life out there?
>latlh yuQmeyDaq yaghmey tu'lu''a'?
>"On other planets one finds organisms?"
>
>What is the future of the human race?
>nuq 'oH Human Segh San'e'?
>"What is Human race destiny?"
>
>Up until the 1920s,
>qaSpa' tera' maH DIS poH 1920
>"Before Terra decade 1920"
>[Should this be tmDp 1920 or tmDp 192?]
>
>everyone thought the universe was essentially static
>Harpu' Hoch,
>"Thought all:"
>
>and unchanging in time.
>choHbe' 'u'.
>"Universe doesn't change."
>
>Then it was discovered that the universe was expanding.
>ghIq tu'lu', SachtaH 'u'.
>"Then one discovers, universe is expanding."
>
>
>Distant galaxies were moving away from us.
>
>cholHa'taH qIbmey Hop.
>
>"Distant galaxies are un-closing in."
>
>
>This meant they must have been closer together in the past.
>
>vaj 'op poH ret wa' DaqDaq Sumbej.
>
>"Thus, some time ago they are definitely close to one place."
>
>
>If we extrapolate back,
>
>mIwvam wInuDchugh, vaj wItlhoj,
>
>"If we inspect this process, then we realize,"
>
>
>we find we must have all been on top of each other
>
>15 000 000 000 ben
>
>"15 000 000 000 years ago"
>
>
>about 15 billion years ago.
>
>wa' DaqDaq Hoch qIbmey tu'lu'.
>
>"In one place all galaxies are found."
>
>
>This was the Big Bang, the beginning of the universe.
>
>ngugh qaS SachchoHghach'a', 'u' chenchoHghach.
>
>"At this time happened the great begin-expand:ation, the universe's
>begin-forming:ation."
>
>
>But was there anything before the Big Bang?
>
>vay' tu'lu''a' qaSpa' SachchoHghach'a'?
>
>"Before the great begin-expand:ation, one found something?"
>
>
>If not, what created the universe?
>
>pagh tu'lu'pu'chugh, 'u' chenmoHpu' nuq?
>
>"If one found nothing, what caused the universe to form?"
>
>
>Why did the universe emerge from the Big Bang the way it did?
>
>qatlh 'u' chenmoHpu' SachchoHghach'a', 'ej qatlh jaS chenbe'pu' 'u'.
>
>"Why the great expand-begin:ation created the universe, and why the
>universe didn't form differently?"
>
>
>We used to think that the theory of the universe
>
>maHarpu', cha' 'ay'mey'e'
>
>"We thought, two parts"
>
>
>could be divided into two parts.
>
>ghaj 'u' nger naQ.
>
>"were had by complete universe theory."
>
>
>First, there were the laws
>
>chutmey'e' pabbogh 'u' tu'lu'.
>
>"There are the laws which the universe obeys."
>
>
>like Maxwell's equations and general relativity
>
>Maxwell 'ul peQ je nger. Einstein tlham nger. latlh chutmey je.
>
>"Maxwell's electricity and magnetism theory. Einstein's gravity
>theory. And other laws."
>
>[Can one say "A B je C" to mean "The C of A an B"?]
>
>
>that determined the evolution of the universe,
>
>chutmeyvam pablu'chu'taH
>
>"These laws are obeyed perfectly"
>
>
>given its state over all of space at one time.
>
>choHtaHvIS 'u' Dotlh.
>
>"while the universe's status changes."
>
>
>And second, there was no question
>
>chutmeyvam 'oH 'u' nger naQ 'ay' wa''e'.
>
>"The first part of the complete theory of the universe is these laws."
>
>[The English transcript is wrong here; should be "there was the question".]
>
>
>of the initial state of the universe.
>
>'u' Dotlh wa'DIch 'oH 'ay' cha''e'.
>
>"Part two is the universe's first status."
>
>
>We have made good progress on the first part,
>
>'ay' wa' wIyajchoHchu'lI'.
>
>"We are beginning to understand part one perfectly."
>
>
>and now have the knowledge of the laws of evolution
>
>ghu'mey le' wIyajchu'be'bogh tu'lu'
>
>"There are special situations which we do not understand perfectly"
>
>
>in all but the most extreme conditions.
>
>'ach tlhoS choHtaHghach chutmey DIyaj.
>
>"but we almost understand the laws of change."
>
>
>But until recently, we have had little idea
>
>'a qen 'u' Dotlh wa'DIch vISovbe'chu'.
>
>"But recently we completely don't know the universe's first status."
>
>
>about the initial conditions for the universe.
>
>pImchugh chuqmey poHmey je,
>
>"If distances and time periods are different,"
>
>[Not entirely sure about the syntax of pIm, but I'm guessing it's
>the same as
>rap. http://klingonska.org/canon/search/?file98-12-holqed-07-4.txt&get=source]
>
>
>However, this division into laws of evolution and initial conditions
>
>vaj pIm nger 'ay'mey.
>
>"then the theory's parts are different."
>
>
>depends on time and space being separate and distinct.
>
>'a chuqmey Da poHmey.
>
>"But time periods act like distances."
>
>
>Under extreme conditions, general relativity and quantum theory
>
>'e' luchaw' ngermey chu' taHtaHvIS ghu'mey le'.
>
>"New theories allow that while special situations last."
>
>
>allow time to behave like another dimension of space.
>
>vaj pImbe' poHmey chuqmey je.
>
>"Thus, time periods and distances aren't different."
>
>
>This removes the distinction between time and space
>
>vaj chutmey DIyajchu'DI', 'u' Dotlh wa'DIch wISovlaH.
>
>"In that case, when we understand the laws perfectly, we can know
>the first status of the universe."
>
>
>and means the laws of evolution can also determine the initial state.
>
>chen'eghmoHlaH 'u'.
>
>"The universe can create itself."
>
>
>The universe can spontaneously create itself out of nothing.
>
>nuq 'oHpu' 'u' Dotlh wa'DIch'e'? DuH Dotlhmey law'.
>
>"What is the first status of the universe? Many statuses are possible."
>
>
>Moreover, we can calculate a probability that the universe
>
>ghaytan qaSbogh DuHmey tu'lu' 'ej ghaytanHa' qaSbogh DuHmey tu'lu'.
>
>"There are possibilities that probably happen and there are
>possibilities that probably don't happen."
>[I just couldn't think of a good way to translate this. Any suggestions?]
>
>
>was created in different states.
>
>wISImlaH.
>
>"We can calculate it."
>
>
>These predictions are in excellent agreement
>
>chenpu'DI' 'u' woj law' tlhuDlu'.
>
>"When the universe formed much radiation is emitted."
>
>
>with observations by the WMAP satellite
>
>'u' Qup cha'bogh mIllogh'e' luchenmoHmeH tejpu'
>
>"In order for scientists to create a picture which shows young universe,"
>
>
>of the cosmic microwave background,
>
>WMAP SIbDoH woj noch patmey lo'ta' chaH.
>
>"they used WMAP satellite's radiation sensor patmey."
>
>
>We think we have solved the mystery of creation.
>
>chen'eghmoHghach Qatlh wIyajlaw'.
>
>"We apparently understand complicated self-creation."
>
>
>Maybe we should patent the universe
>
>mamaqlaH, 'u' wI'oghta'!
>
>"We can proclaim, we have invented the universe!"
>
>[Anybody got a good way to talk about patents in Klingon?]
>
>
>and charge everyone royalties for their existence.
>
>maHvaD DIlnIS 'u' luDalbogh Hoch'e'!
>
>"Everybody who lives in the universe must pay to us!"
>
>
>I now turn to the second big question:
>
>DaH potlh'a' cha' vIqel:
>
>"Now I consider great important thing #2:"
>
>
>Are we alone, or is there other life in the universe?
>
>mamob'a'? pagh latlh yuQmeyDaq yaghmey tu'lu''a'?
>
>"Are we alone? Or are there organisms on other planets?"
>
>[Can also be interpreted as "Are there organisms on no other
>planets?", which also works.]
>
>
>We believe that life arose spontaneously on the Earth,
>
>tera'Daq chenpu' yaghmey. chenmoHta' pagh. 'e' wIHar.
>
>"Organisms formed on Earth. Nobody created it intentionally. This
>we believe."
>
>
>so it must be possible for life to appear on other suitable planets,
>
>vaj chaq latlh yuQmeyDaq chenpu' yaghmey.
>
>"Thus perhaps life can form on other planets."
>
>
>of which there seem to be a large number in the galaxy.
>
>'ej qIbmajDaq law'law' yuQmey'e' DablaHbogh yaghmey.
>
>"And planets that organisms can live on appear to be many in our universe."
>
>
>But we don't know how life first appeared.
>
>chay' chenpu' yaghmey wa'DIch? maSovbe'.
>
>"How did the first organisms form. We don't know."
>
>
>We have two pieces of observational evidence
>
>chenmeH yaghmey 'eb bopbogh De' law''e'
>
>"Much information that's all about the opportunity for organisms to form"
>
>
>on the probability of life appearing.
>
>'ang cha' Dochmey:
>
>"is revealed by two things:"
>
>
>The first is that we have fossils of algae
>
>wutlhDaq yaghmey Hegh DItu'pu'.
>
>"We have found dead organisms underground."
>
>[Oh my... How to describe fossils without it taking up half a page?
>I'd like to put something like "traces of dead organisms" or "signs
>of dead organisms", but just can't think of a way.]
>
>
>from 3.5 billion years ago.
>
>3 500 000 000 ben Hegh yaghmeyvam.
>
>"These organisms die 3.5 billion years ago."
>
>
>The earth was formed 4.6 billion years ago
>
>4 600 000 000 ben chen tera'.
>
>"The Earth forms 4.6 billion years ago."
>
>
>and was probably too hot for about the first half billion years.
>
>qaStaHvIS 500 000 000 DIS, ghaytan tera' luDablaHbe' yaghmey 'Iqmo' tuj.
>
>"While 500 million years happen, organisms probably couldn't inhabit
>the Earth because the heat is too much."
>
>
>So life appeared on earth
>
>vaj DuHpu'DI' yIn,
>
>"Thus when life became possible,"
>
>
>within half a billion years of it being possible,
>
>qaSpa' 500 000 000 DIS chenpu' yaghmey.
>
>"organisms form before 500 million years happen."
>
>
>which is short compared to the ten billion-year lifetime
>
>qaStaHvIS 10 000 000 000 DIS taHlaH tera' lururbogh yuQmey'e'
>
>"Planets which resemble Earth endure while 10 billion years happen"
>
>
>of a planet of Earth-type.
>
>vaj nom chenpu' yaghmey.
>
>"so organisms formed quickly."
>
>
>This suggests that a probability of life appearing is reasonably high.
>
>vaj qubbe'law' chenmeH yaghmey 'ebmey.
>
>"Thus opportunities for organisms to form apparently aren't rare."
>
>
>If it was very low, one would have expected it
>
>qubchugh bIH, ghaytanHa' chen yaghmey
>
>"If there are rare, improbably organisms form"
>
>
>to take most of the ten billion years available.
>
>QuptaHvIS tera'.
>
>"while the Earth is young."
>
>
>On the other hand, we don't seem to have been visited by aliens.
>
>'a nuSuchbe'law'pu' latlh yuQmey nganpu'.
>
>"But other planets' citizens apparently haven't visited us."
>
>
>I am discounting the reports of UFOs.
>
>UFOmeyqoq vIqelbe'taH.
>
>"I'm not taking into account so-called UFO:s."
>[Here I use UFO rather than, say, Dujmey DIngu'be'pu'bogh, as I feel
>"UFO" has become a word in its own right (it's even used in
>languages where the abbreviation doesn't make any sense). Qoch'a' vay'?]
>
>
>Why would they appear only to cranks and weirdos?
>
>qatlh Dujmeyvam tu' taQwI'pu' neH?
>
>"Why do only weird ones observe these ships?"
>
>
>If there is a government conspiracy to suppress the reports
>
>novpu' Sov peghtaH'a' qum?
>
>"Is the government keeping aliens' knowledge secret?"
>
>
>and keep for itself the scientific knowledge the aliens bring,
>
>nIDtaHchugh chaH,
>
>"If they are trying,"
>
>
>it seems to have been a singularly ineffective policy so far.
>
>Qapbe'law'taH.
>
>"apparently they aren't succeeding."
>
>
>Furthermore, despite an extensive search by the SETI project,
>
>novpu' nejtaH SETI jInmol, 'ej vumqu'taH tejpu',
>
>"The SETI project searches for aliens, and the scientists are really toiling,"
>
>[Can a project search?]
>
>
>we haven't heard any alien television quiz shows.
>
>'a pagh nov ghe'naQ jabbI'IDmey Qoypu'.
>
>"but they have heard no alien opera."
>
>
>This probably indicates that there are no alien civilizations
>
>ghu'vammo' maloylaH,
>
>"Because of this situation we can guess,"
>
>
>at our stage of development
>
>'op vatlh loghqam juchbogh moQ'e' qoDDaq
>
>"On the inside of a sphere which has a width of some hundred loghqams"
>
>
>within a radius of a few hundred light years.
>
>tayqeqmaj lururbogh tayqeqmey'e' tu'lu'be'.
>
>"there are no civilizations which resemble our civilization."
>
>
>Issuing an insurance policy
>
>nov quchwI'pu'mo' DuQanmeH
>
>"In order that they protect you because of alien kidnappers"
>
>[Fossils and patents and insurance policies; OH MY!]
>
>
>against abduction by aliens seems a pretty safe bet.
>
>negh yIDIlQo'! ghaytan 'utbe'chu'.
>
>"don't pay for soldiers! It's likely completely non-necessary."
>
>
>This brings me to the last of the big questions:
>
>DaH potlh'a' natlIS vIqel:
>
>"Now I consider the last great important thing:"
>
>
>The future of the human race.
>
>nuq 'oH Human Segh San'e'?
>
>"What is the Human race's destiny?"
>
>
>If we are the only intelligent beings in the galaxy,
>
>qIbvamDaq QublaHbogh latlh yaghmey tu'lu'be'chugh,
>
>"If there aren't other organisms in this galaxy that can think,"
>
>
>we should make sure we survive and continue.
>
>mataHnISqu'!
>
>"we NEED to endure."
>
>
>But we are entering an increasingly dangerous period of our history.
>
>'a QobtaH ghu'maj.
>
>"But our situation is dangerous."
>
>
>Our population and our use of the finite resources of planet Earth
>
>tlhoy law'choHtaH roghvaHmaj 'ej tlhoy tera' jo wInatlhtaH,
>
>"Our population is becoming many excessively and we are consuming
>Earth resources excessively,"
>
>
>are growing exponentially, along with our technical ability
>
>'ej chammaj 'Itlhmo' yuQmaj wISIghlaHqu'.
>
>"and because of our advanced technology we can really affect our planet."
>
>
>to change the environment for good or ill.
>
>wIDublaH 'ej wIQaw'laH.
>
>"We can improve it and we can destroy it."
>
>
>But our genetic code
>
>'a 'IwmajDaq
>
>"But in our blood"
>
>
>still carries the selfish and aggressive instincts
>
>numutmoHbogh nuvaQmoHbogh je Duj tu'lu'taH,
>
>"one also finds the instincts which cause us to be selfish and aggressive,"
>
>[The "Qbogh Pbogh je A" construction is extrapolated from The
>Warrior's Anthem; not entirely kosher, I know.]
>
>
>that were of survival advantage in the past.
>
>poH nI' ret mataHmeH 'utmo' Dujvam.
>
>"because a long time ago these instincts are necessary for us to survive."
>
>
>It will be difficult enough to avoid disaster
>
>qaStaHvIS vatlh DIS poH veb
>
>"While the next century happens"
>
>
>in the next hundred years,
>
>Qugh'a' wIbotlaH'a'? Qatlh.
>
>"can we prevent great disaster? It'll be difficult."
>
>
>let alone the next thousand or million.
>
>qaStaHvIS 'uy' DIS poH veb... Qatlhqu'!
>
>"while the next million year period happens... It'll be VERY difficult!"
>
>
>Our only chance of long-term survival
>
>poH nI' qaStaHvIS mataHtaHmeH
>
>"In order for us to survive while a long time period happens"
>
>
>is not to remain lurking on planet Earth,
>
>latlh qo'mey DIjaHnISqu'.
>
>"latlh qo'mey DIjaHnISqu'."
>
>
>but to spread out into space.
>
>reH tera'Daq maratlhlaHbe'.
>
>"We cannot remain on Earth forever."
>
>
>The answers to these big questions
>
>potlh'a'meyvam DInuDchugh, vaj matlhoj:
>
>"If we inspect these great important things, then we realize:"
>
>
>show that we have made remarkable progress in the last hundred years.
>
>qaStaHvIS vatlh DIS poH vebHa', Ser law' wIta'ta'.
>
>"While the un-next century happens, we have accomplished much progress."
>
>[Using vebHa' to mean "previous". Is that acceptable?]
>
>
>But if we want to continue beyond the next hundred years,
>
>'a qaSpu'DI' vatlh DIS poH veb mataH wIneHchugh,
>
>"But if we want to survive when the next century has happened,"
>
>
>our future is in space.
>
>loghDaq Sanmaj 'oH.
>
>"our destiny is in space."
>
>[Too direct a translation, perhaps? Would something like "loghDaq
>malengnIS" be better?]
>
>
>That is why I am in favor of manned --
>
>loghDaq lujaH nuvpu' vIneH
>
>"I want that people go into space"
>
>[I'm not even going to try to translate this joke.]
>
>
>or should I say, personed space flight.
>
>ngoDvammo'.
>
>"because of this fact."
>
>
>All of my life I have sought to understand the universe
>
>'u' vIyaj reH 'e' vInID 'ej potlh'a'meyvam vIHaD
>
>"I always try to understand the universe and study these great
>important things"
>
>
>and find answers to these questions.
>
>qaStaHvIS yInwIj.
>
>"while my life happens."
>
>
>I have been very lucky
>
>Do' 'e' botqu'be' ropwIj.
>
>"Fortunately my disease does not greatly prevent this."
>
>[Translating "disability" with the same word we use to translate
>"disease" may raise some eyebrows. However, one can always look at
>this sentence as referring to the cause of Professor Hawking's
>disability, and the cause in question is very much a disease (and
>Hawking himself refers to it as motor neurone disease).]
>
>
>that my disability has not been a serious handicap;
>
>chaq nuQaH ropwIj.
>
>"Perhaps my disease helps me."
>
>
>indeed, it has probably given me more time than most people
>
>ropvammo' qaStaHvIS poHmey nI' 'ej law'
>
>"Because of this disease, while time periods many and long happen"
>
>
>to pursue the quest for knowledge.
>
>potlh'a'meyvam vIbuSlaH.
>
>"I can concentrate entirely on these great important things."
>
>
>The ultimate goal is a complete theory of the universe,
>
>'u' nger naQ 'oH ngoQ'a''e',
>
>"The great goal is a complete theory of the universe,"
>
>
>and we are making good progress.
>
>'ej Ser law' wIta'lI'.
>
>"and we are accomplishing much progress (towards a known goal)."
>
>
>Thank you for listening.
>
>Su'Ijpu'mo' jItlho'.
>
>"I am grateful because you listened."
>
>
>Chris Anderson: Professor, if you had to guess either way,
>
>Chris Anderson: ghojmoHwI''a' bIloynISchugh:
>
>"Chris Anderson: Great teacher, if you must guess:"
>
>
>do you now believe that it is more likely than not
>
>ghaytan qIbmajDaq mamob'a'?
>
>"Are we probably alone in our galaxy?"
>
>
>that we are alone in the Milky Way,
>
>tayqeqmaj 'Itlh law' Hoch 'Itlh puS. DuH'a'?
>
>"We are the most advanced civilization. Is it possible?"
>
>
>as a civilization of our level of intelligence or higher?
>
>nuq DaHar?
>
>"What do you believe?"
>
>
>This answer took seven minutes, and really gave me an insight
>
>jangmeH vumta' ghaH qaStaHvIS Soch tupmey.
>
>"In order to answer he toiled while seven minutes happen."
>
>
>into the incredible act of generosity this whole talk was for TED.
>
>quvba' ghojmoHwI''a', TEDvam SoQvam nI' ghItlhta'mo'.
>
>"The great teacher is definitely honorable, because he has written
>this long lecture for TED."
>
>
>Stephen Hawking: I think it quite likely that we are the only civilization
>
>Stephen Hawking: ghaytan 'op vatlh loghqam juchbogh moQ'e' qoDDaq
>
>"Stephen Hawking: Probably on the inside of a sphere which is some
>hundreds of loghqams wide"
>
>
>otherwise we would have heard radio waves.
>
>nov jabbI'IDmey DItu'be'pu'mo'.
>
>"because we have not observed alien data transmissions."
>
>
>The alternative is that civilizations don't last very long,
>
>pagh chaq ngaj tayqeq yInmey
>
>"Or perhaps civilization lives are short"
>
>
>but destroy themselves.
>
>Qaw''eghmo' bIH.
>
>"because the destroy themselves."
>
>
>CA: Professor Hawking, thank you for that answer.
>
>CA: Hawking ghojmoHwI''a', bIjangta'mo' matlho'.
>
>"Great teacher Hawking, because you have answered we are greatful."
>
>
>We will take it as a salutary warning, I think,
>
>ghuHvammo'
>
>"Because of this alert"
>
>
>for the rest of our conference this week.
>
>qaStaHvIS qepmaj mayep.
>
>"we are careful while our meeting happens."
>
>
>Professor, we really thank you for the extraordinary effort you made
>
>ghojmoHwI''a', De'vam DaghermeH bIvumqu'ta'mo'
>
>"Great teacher, because you have toiled greatly in order to compile
>this lecture"
>
>
>to share your questions with us today.
>
>SoHvaD matlho'.
>
>"we are grateful to you."
>
>
>Thank you very much indeed.
>
>pItlho'qu'bej.
>
>"We are definitely very grateful to you."
>
>
>(Applause)
>
>(quvmoHmeH wabmey)
>
>"(Sounds for honoring)"
>
>
>
>...aaaaand DONE! Huzzah!
>
>
>//loghaD
![[KLI Member]](/pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}
![[Hol po'wI']](/pics/level3_big.png "[Hol po'wI']"){kind=small}