tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 09 16:22:42 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: rugh qogh Samta'

R Fenwick ([email protected])

• From: R Fenwick <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: rugh qogh Samta'
• Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:20:03 +1000
• Importance: Normal

ghItlhpu' Voragh, jatlh:
>Corrrect me if I'm wrong:  antiprotons aren't  quite anti-hydrogen, but close:

I recently had need of translating "antiproton", and I used {rugh bIQSIp tat}
"antimatter hydrogen ion". I realise hydrogen is capable of forming negative
ions by acquiring extra electrons, but by far the most common hydrogen ion is
the positively charged one formed when it loses its only electron, becoming in
essence a single bare proton.

QeS 'utlh
 		 	   		  

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: rugh qogh Samta'
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Hey tlhinganhol!
• Next by Date: RE: rugh qogh Samta'
• Previous by thread: Re: rugh qogh Samta'
• Next by thread: RE: rugh qogh Samta'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level