tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 18 19:20:26 2010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Old topic
- From: Doq <[email protected]>
- Subject: Old topic
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:17:42 -0400
- Authentication-results: smtp01.embarq.synacor.com [email protected]; auth=pass (LOGIN)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=embarqmail.com; s=s012408; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; [email protected]; t=1274235462; h=From:Subject:Date:To:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=DZ5NSmgM6ofVWLHlSLx7iU/OD+Q=; b=XqMcQ0kbOa5XIpVffv7S4qygyPASoFUhsBp4wKhg3YxdSKHKkgIdVRs7t2qQUC2N Me92iOm7OhB9MDiu17Aiy//fXYWHdMX+l3ExGtjDdAGPvKh+gTrolrAgLfI+tZPr;
- X_cmae_category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
I got a couple hundred messages behind. Zipping through them, I saw someone suggesting something about {leghlu'ghach} that was alien to anything I'd expect.
First, I'd expect usage to be extremely rare, requiring special circumstances. Imagine that you were investigating a crime that you know had witnesses, but you have no means to find them. Without the witnesses, you can't solve the crime. The investigator reports to his superior:
HeSvam leghlu'ghachmo' Qu'wIj vIta'laHbe'neS.
Because of the indefiniteness of who saw this crime, I cannot accomplish my mission, sir.
{{:-)>
Doq