tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 27 07:34:20 2010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: SV: mu' chu'
- From: Fiat Knox <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: SV: mu' chu'
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:32:59 +0000 (GMT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1280241180; bh=Syn9ZvabAkRWB4o4a8mTWE38lNXUL9Ks2iOPXHj6Ugs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rOXJEobyx76Yr6oGPQap/YaLjZsetLL/nQhEd+6Tc8nK2CiZzw4CYZ4eYpAR6ZcUyn3DyD6fRnbY8/CPFGTOpogyNTyHEwKS0Dy7BbZ60pMwT2SIY1Wcxkj3SiGLwdbgsXGmAn2z8pdXmf5NNo3TAblhgrvfJa1iUpsON9r+Fpg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=24HAf4X3VC9GmMQl24L/6/vdd5vKHARC4TenR3lG8MPoVL8v065xO4GkWnmhlLph9RPOygXjGTn3Om1NN6zLwP6D53VXs7sHzRYx7v105l1NLqSRSaLsOd9MWWcFlTlFnoVFnD5mQWxuvZs9FpyDJosGZKXy1ucp39p77dr/RJ4=;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
> > Marc also clarified that Qutlh
> (support) can only refer to physically
> > supporting something.
> Hmm, it would appear I've made a mistake in a wedding
> speech translation I did, where I suggested that the bride
> and groom should go on Qutlh:ing each other.
> Hopefully, if there were any jatlhwI'pu' in the audience,
> they just took it as a colorful metaphor :P
If they'd been at the champagne a little too heavily, they could have interpreted your words as literal truth. ;)