tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 04 15:46:33 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: qoSwIj

David Trimboli ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



On 1/4/2010 6:08 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:45 PM, David Trimboli<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> I suspect Thorwald meant to emphasize the "today," as you guess above,
>> but then you'd have to put {-'e'} on two different verbs in the
>> sentence, and that'd be weird. We don't know if that kind of thing is
>> allowed.
>
> Two different nouns, you mean. :)

Ya.

> Agreed, it seems odd to have two topics.  Does the -'e' in copula
> sentences have any emphatic force left?  If so, just making the noun
> you want to emphasize the topic would seem to work here.  But it could
> be that the -'e' is pure syntax at this point, in which case I'm not
> sure how one would go about adding emphasis.

I believe that {-'e'} is performing its primary function, which is 
topicalization. "Let's talk about my birthday. It is today."

> Tangentially related question: is the -'e' required to be on the
> second noun in a copula, or can it be on the first?

TKD p. 68: "If the subject is a noun, it follows the third-person 
pronoun... and takes the {-'e'} /topic/ suffix..." I don't think we have 
any examples that contradict this.

-- 
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/






Back to archive top level