tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 09 04:08:01 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: The meaning of -moH

ghunchu'wI' (

On Oct 8, 2009, at 11:16 AM, wrote:

> mumISmoH mu'tlheghmeylIj.
> First you say only no-object prefixes are used with {Qong}, then  
> you say
> such prefixes are *not* used with {Qong}.

Sorry, I mangled the context.  Before I rearranged and consolidated  
my words, "such prefixes" referred to "prefixes indicating an object".

I think TKD says that {Qong} does not have an object.

-- ghunchu'wI'

Back to archive top level