tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 09 04:08:01 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: The meaning of -moH
On Oct 8, 2009, at 11:16 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> mumISmoH mu'tlheghmeylIj.
> First you say only no-object prefixes are used with {Qong}, then
> you say
> such prefixes are *not* used with {Qong}.
Sorry, I mangled the context. Before I rearranged and consolidated
my words, "such prefixes" referred to "prefixes indicating an object".
I think TKD says that {Qong} does not have an object.
-- ghunchu'wI'