tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 06 20:08:35 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: The meaning of -moH

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: The meaning of -moH
• Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:06:43 EDT

In a message dated 10/6/2009 22:26:11 Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> mu'tlheghlIjvaD, mu' {tlhob} nIv law', mu' {ghel} nIv puS. nuv  
> tlhoblu'. qech ghellu'.
> 
> Doq
> 
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > In a message dated 10/6/2009 19:23:25 Eastern Daylight Time,
> > [email protected] writes:
> >
> >> GERMAN:
> >> Ich lasse ihn ihn fragen.
> >> I.NOM let.PRS him.ACC him.ACC ask.INF
> >> = "I let him ask him."
> >>
> >> Here, causee and final object are marked both with the dative,  
> >> which is the
> >> usual case for primary objects. English looks similar but has no  
> >> obvious
> >> dative case, which can serve to perhaps distinguish the two objects.
> >>
> >
> > Both occurrences of "ihn" in this sentence are accusative, "the  
> > usual case
> > for primary objects", not dative, and you yourself so indicated with  
> > ".ACC".
> > The first is the direct object of "lasse" and the second is the direct
> > object of "fragen".
> >
> > (ghaH) ghel (ghaH) 'e' vIchaw'.
> >
> > lay'tel SIvten
> 

bIlughbe'law'.  vay' ngoD vISov vIneHchugh, vay' nuv vIghel. mulob vay' 
vIneHchugh, vItlhob (pagh vIpoQ pagh vIra'). 
vItlhobchugh "Doytlh" Hol vIlo'taHvIS, vaj <bitten> vIjatlh. vIghelchugh 
vaj Holvam mu' <fragen> vIjatlh.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The meaning of -moH
    • From: Doq <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: The meaning of -moH
• Next by Date: tlhob/ghel (was Re: The meaning of -moH)
• Previous by thread: Re: The meaning of -moH
• Next by thread: Re: The meaning of -moH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level