On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:41 PM, qurgh lungqIj wrote: > Should there be an -'e' on Soj to mark is as the head noun of the - > bogh > clause or is that optional? > > na'ran rurbogh Soj'e' luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv. It's optional. Since {na'rsn'e' rurbogh Soj} seems a silly thing to say, I would consider marking {Soj} to be superfluous. --ghunchu'wI'