tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 01 04:13:49 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: na'ran rur [Re: Klingon WOTD: na' (verb)]

ghunchu'wI' (qunchuy@alcaco.net)



On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:41 PM, qurgh lungqIj wrote:

> Should there be an -'e' on Soj to mark is as the head noun of the - 
> bogh
> clause or is that optional?
>
> na'ran rurbogh Soj'e' luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.

It's optional.

Since {na'rsn'e' rurbogh Soj} seems a silly thing to say, I would  
consider marking {Soj} to be superfluous.

--ghunchu'wI'






Back to archive top level