tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 26 21:19:23 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: {-lu'} on intransitive verbs [WAS Re: The topic marker -'e']

ghunchu'wI' ([email protected])

• From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: {-lu'} on intransitive verbs [WAS Re: The topic marker -'e']
• Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:18:15 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

ja'pu' Christopher Doty:

> Can we see some canon with -lu'?
> I'd guess that you can't actually get it on <bIr>,...

ja' 'Isqu':
> pujwI' HIvlu'chugh *quvbe'lu'*.
> There is no honor in attacking the weak.
> TKW, p. 24

pItlho', 'ISqu'.  Christopher jangchu' mu'tlheghvam'e'.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • {-lu'} on intransitive verbs [WAS Re: The topic marker -'e']
    • From: Agnieszka Solska <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Adverb placement (was Re: The topic marker -'e')
• Next by Date: Re: Adverb placement (was Re: The topic marker -'e')
• Previous by thread: Re: {-lu'} on intransitive verbs [WAS Re: The topic marker -'e']
• Next by thread: > RE: Question about Klingon books (e.g., Gilgamesh et al.)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level