tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 26 10:34:38 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Adverb placement (was Re: The topic marker -'e')
- From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Adverb placement (was Re: The topic marker -'e')
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:32:14 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DMw0FErol75Kt6Ndb00F03OYeB6wYw8Sm+nTg6ozzP4=; b=PXi5qGhEBHBbDoLLlBKzSWUGA3WY9KeyyzaveAqFo6g1XudFX5xS70NzXV99gNdLl7 nHrSulIDiCLXqojSQG67xA48c+6FjE5OYy/rdNo8JKVNMHMDlsD1g64CGzwFqbQqwtmU au3KoVF/8mBHWUZpSUkVd5sOZvYo7vD4gObP0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sHGYQtnCV57dxRdZlvwWEZDurmK4lap0dxAMk+XZgiF2cU07p9vxOHmtWc1jUFxieD juBdmGS1OhApGsCngKgNqu5rG3AD8yXtuG088bJhlRXrSw1ez2o86KbSyV+UeS7RNOON +NiiLh728t93OGemXoCOB+nDcIwYWA7UdWwok=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 05:30, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. This is a sentence-as-object construction. The {DaH} applies to
> {'e' vIHech} ("I intend that now"), not to {jIQongchoH} (I didn't mean
> "I begin to sleep now").
>
> The first sentence in an SAO is not really "embedded." Sentence one is
> not "physically" the object of sentence two. The two sentences are
> merely juxtaposed, and the pronoun {'e'} refers to sentence one and
> takes its place as the object of sentence two.
>
> However, it's important to note that Okrand has never used an adverbial
> along with {'e'} or {net}, so we have no examples of this sort of thing
> in action. This simply follows the basic rules in TKD. There is only one
> example of an adverbial with a SAO in all the canon:
>
> reH DIvI' Duj vISuv vIneH
> I've always wanted to fight a Federation ship. (ST5)
>
> Naturally, Captain Klaa didn't mean that he wanted to "always fight" a
> Federation ship. However, SAOs with {neH} don't (usually) use {'e'} or
> {net}, so it's possible that with these the first sentence is, in fact,
> "embedded" in the second as its object. Without further evidence, we
> can't really tell.
But Okrand tells us: "When the verb of the second sentence is <neH>
want, neither <'e'> nor <net> is used, but *the construction is
otherwise identical* to that just described." (emphasis mine)
I see
> reH DIvI' Duj vISuv vIneH
> I've always wanted to fight a Federation ship. (ST5)
As
[reH [[DIvI' Duj vISuv] vIneH]]
<reh> modifies the entire thing, not just the object sentence.
Likewise, since these are identical except the use of 'e',
[DaH [[jIQongchoH] ['e' vIHech]]
"Now I intend to sleep"
Since we see that an adverbial initially modifies not just the
sentence which is the object, the whole clause that follows.
It seems like
[[jIQongchoH] [DaH ['e' vIHech]]]
"I intend now to sleep" (??)
Would mean the same thing, basically, with maybe a shade of meaning
difference? The real issue, then, is how you would say "I want to be
always fighting Federation starships".....