tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 19 16:32:54 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: tlhIngan porgh

Stephen A. Carter (scarter@hticn.com) [KLI Member]



On 09/11/20 06:02, Steven Boozer wrote:
> Voragh:
>>> and  {porghQeD} "the scientific study of bodily functions (anatomy?).
> 
> Stephen A. Carter:
>> "Physiology" might be a closer fit.
> 
> Nice.  That fits Maltz/Okrand's explanation better:
> 
> HQ 12.4:8:  Maltz was familiar with the scientific study of bodily functions, or {porghQeD}, but he didn't consider himself terribly well versed in the field. The closest he could come to "bodily function" was {porgh mIw}, literally "body process", but he had a hard time thinking of an everyday sentence containing that phrase. He said that Klingons don't talk all that much about bodily functions as a group, but they certainly do talk about specific bodily functions. 

> But if we limit {porghQeD} ("body science") to "physiology", how would we differentiate it from "anatomy"?

That's a good question.

As a starting point for discussion, physiology deals with the body's 
functioning, and anatomy deals with its structure.  And since {porghQeD} 
is canonically defined as "the scientific study of bodily functions," it 
looks like it maps to physiology, rather than anatomy.

-- 
Stephen A. Carter
scarter@hticn.com
Nagoya, Japan






Back to archive top level