tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 12 07:33:29 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Yet another newbie!

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Yet another newbie!
• Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:32:02 -0800 (PST)
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1258039923; bh=a/BVo8hmGx8w8iLwfZfOfx5MspuoanLwqptyKH/d/VY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wEntSptCX9/P5567Y91yXVXY4MGVvuC8P48YWHWaZgFhM/aJJm5/51X+L9s/0INi45SJFvQwd61fsbIcidjqZ++qICd7EAO6XgH+ZFzM7Onji+eHXnr34KeYQNIDlfqBoJCgkKqeBVlsID0ENrLPnFzZWumP+IxPhMYu2bSrLrk=
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6Oz6c5qe4dx36o5A8lCtwuc58KxL5GmOz6gbsSxlR24f66MrPd6yGKbnsCuKjAD6Rj7gQQEzelZ4+kX0cAhTeQAZ0EVTRtSRWrX1N30MXNvodfyaLkapS4XHhTTl3Ow9vT/8mXjYAktgHkeMrD1MNEf1TYwvggKZf68tm48ugPc=;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- On Thu, 11/12/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> {jIHvaD De' Danobta' 'e'vaD qatlho'}
> 
> Ok, I think this is wrong, but I can't figure out how to
> say 'because'.
> It's not really 'in order to', so I can't use '-meH', I
> think. Tricky.
>

The suffix {-mo'} is what you want. This would eliminate the need for {'e'}, which AFAIK never takes any suffixes, anyway. So,

{jIHvaD De' Danobmo' qatlho'}

>...
> 
> > And don't forget the movies, they contain the
> "original" Klingon, even
> > though it's sometimes hard to understand.
> 
> I have seen the first (many years ago) and the third. Are
> there any other
> movies with a lot of Klingon?
> 

I have several movies in Klingon on my website. Not canon, of course, but I think my pronunciation is at least as good as most of the official actors.

http://teresh.tdonnelly.org

-- ter'eS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Yet another newbie!
    • From: Tracy Canfield <[email protected]>
  • Re: Yet another newbie!
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Yet another newbie!
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: latlh qech vIja'qa'law' neH (was Re: Yet another newbie!)
• Next by Date: Re: Yet another newbie!
• Previous by thread: Re: Yet another newbie!
• Next by thread: Re: Yet another newbie!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level