tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 17 13:39:27 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingon Ad for my new novel!
bIqar. HolQeD vol 5 num 3 page15 - S26.
On May 17, 2009, at 4:13 PM, David Trimboli wrote:
> Doq wrote:
>> On May 16, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Dr. Lawrence M. Schoen wrote:
>>> ghItlh Doq:
>>>> DubtaHba' tlhIngan Hol laHlIj.
>>> Clearly your suffix order error has been included as a test.
>>> Personally, I don't like N-N-N constructions. They feel clunky to
>>> I'd have recast this as a complex sentence, thusly:
>>> tlhIngan Hol lo'meH Dubba'taH laHlIj.
>>> Or something similar. Of course, I am not one of the grammarians,
>>> and there may be other errors creeping in that I fail to see.
>> Good suggestion, though I'd tend to say it one of two ways:
>> tlhIngan Hol Dalo'meH Dubba'taH laHlIj.
>> Dubba'taH tlhIngan Hol lo'meH laHlIj.
> Now that I think about it, I seem to remember that canon has /Dub/
> tlhIngan Hol laHlIj DaDubba'taH.
> In any case, your first sentence doesn't work because your ability
> doesn't improve so that you can speak Klingon; your "ability for
> speaking Klingon" improves.
> David Trimboli