tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 25 10:19:40 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon orthography

ghunchu'wI' 'utlh ([email protected])

From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Klingon orthography
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:18:25 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> In a message dated 6/25/2009 05:02:12 Eastern Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
>> I suspect then that you
>
> [remainder clipped as irrelevant]
>
> Did anything follow "I suspect then that you"?  This is at least the second
> time I've noticed unfinished remarks in an email on this list recently, and
> I think they were both from Everson.

cha' jabbI'IDvetlh vIlegh je jIH. naQHa'law' je latlh mu'tlhegh;
<-chugh> qeng wot mob. 'ej qaStaHvIS cha' jaj, wejlogh ghaHvaD
jabbI'ID chIm vIHev. chaq bong ngeHmeH leQ chu', Degh Qatlh
ghItlhtaHvIS.

"T, r, alt-shift-five, control-shift-option-rootbeer, Hu'tegh."

-- ghunchu'wI'

Follow-Ups:
- De'wI' 'awje'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Klingon orthography
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: tlhIngan Degh (was Re: bong tlhIngan Hol pIqaD je vItu')
Next by Date: Re: [KLBC?] word order and sentence in General.
Previous by thread: Re: Klingon orthography
Next by thread: De'wI' 'awje'
Index(es):