tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 23 21:11:12 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon orthography (was: Okrand at qep'a')

MorphemeAddict (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



In a message dated 6/23/2009 22:11:50 Eastern Daylight Time, mark@kli.org 
writes:

>  The ambiguities introduced by folding q/Q are not 
> trivial, or we wouldn't bother distinguishing them in the first place.  
> There does not appear to be any reason within the language to consider 
> the two phonemes to be related lexically.
> 

That's a good point.

lay'tel SIvten






Back to archive top level