tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 23 19:06:11 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon orthography

Michael Roney, Jr. ([email protected])



Small point: I think CBS is now the owner.
TKD is still in production. People still buy TKD. A new book published by a third-party is unlikly--but good luck.


~naHQun

(yes, I know I'm a few hours behind)


-Michael Roney, Jr.
http://twitter.com/roneyii

--Sent from my Palm PreMichael Everson wrote:

On 23 Jun 2009, at 20:56, David Trimboli wrote:

>> Of course he can! He could, for instance, implement a spelling reform
>> and publish a third edition of his dictionary. Heck, I'd be happy to
>> typeset it for him.
>
> I would be the first in line to buy it, but I know it's just not up to
> Marc Okrand to decide this; it's up to Paramount.

An author can write whatever books he wants. Who owns the word  
"Qapla'"? Okrand? Paramount? I know that Paramount owns Klingons.  
Language is something else.

> And they're never going to do another one, not unless Klingons  
> become really, really popular again.

Paramount didn't write the Klingon Dictionary. Okrand did. Maybe they  
paid him to. Maybe he did it on his own and they get a cut. I don't  
know what the arrangements were. It was most likely Simon and Schuster  
ponied up to publish the actual book. Or?

> (If another Abrams TREK features Klingons speaking true Okrandian  
> Klingon, maybe it would happen. Otherwise, no.)

I can hardly imagine Paramount forbidding a publication if it didn't  
cost them anything and if the usual arrangements were made.

So that's not a reason not to at least look at good vs. bad options  
for spelling reform.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/











Back to archive top level