tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 20 14:12:16 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Once more into the ship in which I fled
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Once more into the ship in which I fled
- Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1245532244; bh=iSvgbdEyuT/CwgATnjVdgv2WhLjKEQXlxeZG5Myf22Q=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZTDBdLq7z/G+z4u4mJHmMqBU8a3cArH2MbibHCZgaX+z9xJqrdLTxZ34IslG4zV/Tlw+QkrI3pfsfnt3Ju0FWdFnFRaNNNqrYhUc0q6KYngIM1XDbTsV3ijiWEQot+QREJvGwSlvvxHY7OlHjtTT9YLyeODlmD3hUtd7Mp0W+W8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NXEkJfSvpLV77ZM26aA4ElxiO+3WXkFO+KyEqwcYYiGGYnJ4M21lkdsn17f51tSragqW7j5xONKzF04eCKJkIW9k/wmtYxO9JhQkSMUVgYQe68jUYoSlcTnVTq9vYGo1rk4czbaMReMZyidTl92J7kXGSTF/TwHEydIrsEydVwI=;
--- On Sat, 6/20/09, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Terrence Donnelly wrote:
> > Not to be a contrarian or anything, but what about the
> proverb
> > {meQtaHbogh qachDaq Suv qoH neH}? I know MO originally
> said he
> > couldn't make relative clauses work as anything but
> subjects or
> > objects, except here he did.
>
> He couldn't make the head noun of a relative clause be
> anything other
> than the subject or object *of the relative clause*, not of
> the main
> sentence.
>
Now this I can agree wholeheartedly with. But is it then possible that the head noun can be either the subject, object, or _any Type-5 suffixed noun_ to the main verb?
Which wouldn't have any answers for the "ship in which I fled", since the head noun is not the subject or object of the relative verb.
-- ter'eS
![[KLI Member]](../../../pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}