tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 26 17:55:57 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: 'oQqar pe'pu'bogh; naQHommey rur ghIq mIQpu'
- From: Krenath <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: 'oQqar pe'pu'bogh; naQHommey rur ghIq mIQpu'
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:54:14 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:references; bh=OaN4j2ht2uhX1C/2iG7ZEa0oxTrDcK/fABdUJFt4i2M=; b=Lma/rFqvvK1C0A5yp+TbJAdyfGdCUboLLAJzHjkKWPuJ5Be0jFkt1aU4hjQHdDBs2z h8nSBxJTSiu1W++tFhOlkrvIyXOabFlA0bYw4USAKJ4EY0LLfWX/OtsNPiV/7aj6cP6K 2f2hnU9AZHOc4gTgfrgrX6qlTsNUVt87wDv7M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date :references; b=uCugXL8ueTU8uyTaRlIrfHSTB1MF3i9g80taywtn5XxHLBiU35gW+uc85br2yg26xB 0ZoZwvocbrDgk0fp8PF1k/SNilYKGGpt5TIMXHNdtU+i2eoDg/nBxC7Ct0xQMsVxMoB3 VLONoQxaWrGtFN7reLJ4msv5YKDoNw3bnHRB4=
- In-reply-to: <E76F41A2E1CB468187E60EE68582C0C8@HPBrownPC>
- References: <E76F41A2E1CB468187E60EE68582C0C8@HPBrownPC>
Is <mIQ> a word for 'fry'? I can only find 'forehead (regional)' as a
definition for it.
Tubers which have been cut, resemble little sticks, then are forehead-
ed. :)
On Jul 26, 2009, at 7:12 PM, "qe'San \(Jon Brown\)" <[email protected]
> wrote:
> What I'd like to know is, does anyone understand my following
> sentence:
> 'oQqar pe'pu'bogh; naQHommey rur. ghIq mIQpu'
>
> If you do what does it mean to you?
> - is it messy or just bad use of grammar
> - is there an accepted KLI slang equivalent?
>
> If it's just nonsense
> - let me know and I'll say what I was trying to describe/mean.
> - although did you at least get the gist of what I meant?
>
> qe'San
>