tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 01 13:18:47 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingon cardinal directions
- From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Klingon cardinal directions
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:17:07 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HJhSk7xgpYlrXRXIqQeE8G8RG0eZWT5ZxyseM0nWf5Y=; b=LevEqqYceNSw1uieYGLPa9GtgTh4K+59vznH/WwF7IHTzkdNXDX9rES2N5xCNAS641 CgqI/cKj5G+s+xZ2OumSa3ErDN+GjWik67d1iqa2mZ8HLe2lFsJ3eLp3Z5KVlhkAUB/m pU1lvx+IA1z3WBzbnGhp4SxWhh0F1ffpFk4bo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NeEOiS1zNWeWZzqXp8bB2380fDtwS/NZU9HxTZSVBaZLHGDMVJDwK27edBzcDEyjn/ 5Q+cH7SBsTkHOCiGmyYj95M+r7n21Ho/14UVPPcBaw0cvWH4WFehK/HXztQlSxeyZF71 UlY+ABqD+lAwJ8wQvA5UpmChlgwcMNEydluUA=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
The Enterprise Incident would probably be the best shot of a D7 - but
of course it's a Romulan ship, with Romulan markings...
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, DloraH<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Does anyone remember its orientation on Koloth's ship, the
>> IKV Groth, in DS9 "Trials and Tribble-ations"? ÂDid they
>> include a CGI version of the ship?
>
> I didn't re-watch the entire episode, but jumping through I saw only one scene showing the klingon
> ship, and like ghunchu'wI' I did not see any trefoil, but there was what looked like some pIqaD.
>
>
>> (For that matter, what
>> about the new digitally-enhanced versions of TOS "The Trouble
>> With Tribbles" etc.?)
>
> Don't know if it is the "enhanced" version, but the TOS DVD I have did not show any klingon ship in
> The Trouble With Tribbles. ÂThey show the Enterprise orbiting the space station, but not the klingon
> ship.
>
>
> DloraH
>
>
>
>
>
--
Mark J. Reed <[email protected]>