tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 24 15:39:37 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: The language of the spirit

ghunchu'wI' ([email protected])

• From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: The language of the spirit
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:37:53 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

On Apr 24, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Elizabeth Lawrence wrote:

> ...in a poetic context, I was wondering if it might be acceptable  
> to use these suffixes when referring to batlh (honor) given the  
> Klingon propensity for nearly personifying it.

bom DaqontaHvIS, Hol chutmey DapablaH pagh Dapabbe'laH.  lajbe'chugh  
vay', SaH 'Iv?  bomlIj 'oH.

In a poetic context, rules of language are there to be followed or  
ignored as the poet sees fit.  Not everything an artist produces will  
be considered "acceptable" by everyone, but isn't that part of the  
reason for art to exist in the first place?

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • The language of the spirit
    • From: Elizabeth Lawrence <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: In the interest of promoting disscussion
• Next by Date: Re: In the interest of promoting disscussion
• Previous by thread: The language of the spirit
• Next by thread: RE: The language of the spirit
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level