tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 18 15:55:39 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: A fun application of the "prefix trick"

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=DvcI9Lrtlov8/vP1/xv+OxIJbI4OknjAeVAGNYcdn/KMJfQd8ImzOrl2wIqahm/2R8lbgjTIoQDKNqhMGnamsZgfrh5uaA/09i/6lP03h7DF40+5WTCg9JWud6Y3YZPW5ig9JJy3/VB6/xsXroQKo9LyB2z/NTwUzteQkzg1x7g=;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- On Thu, 9/18/08, Doq <[email protected]> wrote:

> Obviously, I owe Ter'eS an apology. There is indeed one
> example of  
> unexplained canon backing up his version of grammatical
> truth. 

bItlhIj 'e' vIlaj.

-- ter'eS

• References:
  • Re: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
    • From: Doq <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Next by Date: paqmey...
• Previous by thread: Re: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Next by thread: RE: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level