tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 17 20:37:42 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Syntax, semantics

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Syntax, semantics
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=sSI8FtugsJGeL998ElasXWQRq/yw/Q4PHm+9Ojj6A158bIPzCLNPDwDV3VUhjpgj9LiBcUgNOtXXj6jNq2CJiKEi8cl86uiza4YuYgbELdBHFhn4W06PfcbIepYUlrbZPErPvKBe5lI3WjJ7ee8X4AwyX3SWM0Q8jABBhTgLWRs=;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- On Wed, 9/17/08, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it would help the grammatical discussion of -moH if
> we clarified 
> whether we were talking about syntax or semantics, and
> whether we're 
> sure what's what.
> 

Using your terms, how do you interpret the transform {quH qaw worIv} -> {worIvvaD quH qawmoH Ha'quj}?

--ter'eS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Syntax, semantics
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Syntax, semantics
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Syntax, semantics
• Next by Date: Re: Syntax, semantics
• Previous by thread: Syntax, semantics
• Next by thread: Re: Syntax, semantics
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level