tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 17 14:00:28 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: A fun application of the "prefix trick"

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=nz2onu1g0T47ktin/UeW+K/GBZQadB0K8gWlszEoBDD4JcakCQpsHxmEK9Re20xxK1ozblBugYcmZp2tlwSMo8L7htrfuQ8tWjDTRF4edGT40D1GjCxmJm/PBYACknfuKM2edzWoYECqIuize5sCVR1PcYEAzvn8E8kKjGT3JAs=;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- On Wed, 9/17/08, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:

> As opposed to the problematic ?{juH vIvu' 'e'
> mughojmoH SoS} "I manage the house. Mother teaches me
> that."

This construction follows the notion that the object of {ghojmoH} is the same object as that of {ghoj}, i.e., the thing learned/taught, so you can see why I wanted to avoid it!

-- ter'eS

• References:
  • RE: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Next by Date: RE: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Previous by thread: RE: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Next by thread: Re: A fun application of the "prefix trick"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level