tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 12 07:51:02 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?
• Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:49:12 -0800 (PST)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Qog9DTkgH1nOfqlDmO3P0CjGJjK5NyaqSfx2qSprluSfSnwTo6k2S5Cn1IzcKO6GuuMKxp7zklqDvtevVGoLCP6A5TOHkcKjPxKdsxje1JVJIIVjqBR3skQ8uHsC8TdDshpXmSZOprp2G7gAHrvFuCh+PthTqHlfnDPRvTw6PTw=;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- Alan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> ja' Doq:
> 
> > There are some words I have not seen before. Where
> did the following
> > words  come from?

> 
> > jIn
> 
> I don't recognize this one.  Might it be a typo for
> {jIm}  
> "heave" (HolQeD 11:2, page 9)?
> 

A typo?! And I suppose "brew" is a typo for "heave"?

> 
> > Qompu'
> 
> Never heard of it, unless it's just {Qom} + {-pu'}.
> 
> > Sutovoqor
> 
> I suspect this is merely an "assumed spelling", not
> an official one.   
> It's {Suto'vo'qor} in _Diplomatic Implausibility_.
> 

I admit I'm not too good at retaining the sources of
the new words, but I promise you I have _never_
included in Kliflash a word I just cobbled together or
assumed the spelling of.  Maybe Voragh will come to my
rescue.

As for Kliflash and it's database, it uses a
proprietary encoding scheme (my way of trying to avoid
copyright troubles).  It can only be opened and used
by a working copy of Kliflash or the database
management tool, Klimaint.

The latest version of Kliflash was written under
Windows, and I don't know if there's any way to get it
to run on a Mac.  You could use the earlier DOS-based
Kliflash in a DOS emulator, maybe.  The database is
the same, just the user interface is different.

(Qov, qatlho'!)

-- ter'eS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: naQHom (noun)
• Next by Date: Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?
• Previous by thread: Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?
• Next by thread: Re: chu''a' cha' mu', wej mu' ghap?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level