tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jun 10 13:56:28 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: Some more clueless questions

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: Some more clueless questions
• Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:52:25 EDT

I think I'm coming 'round to Doq's viewpoint.  It would have been better for 
Okrand to gloss {tuQ} as "be dressed".
lay'tel SIvten   </HTML>

• Follow-Ups:
  • {tuQ} (was Re: KLBC: Some more clueless questions)
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: qep'a' mebpa'mey
• Next by Date: Beware of fake pills
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: Some more clueless questions
• Next by thread: {tuQ} (was Re: KLBC: Some more clueless questions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level