tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 19 16:38:09 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'

Alan Anderson (aranders@insightbb.com) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



ja' SuStel:

> The predicative in a Klingon "to be" sentence isn't complementing the
> topic, it's complementing the copula. This is why I didn't call the
> topic of a copula a "subject" instead.

Your take on "to be" seems quite different from how TKD describes  
it.  Okrand does label the thing doing the "being" as the subject.

> I'm applying the word "predicative" to Klingon grammar, not  
> English, and
> I'm defining it slightly differently than it is defined in English, so
> don't get too caught up in its English definition.

Fine, I'll try to treat your use of the term the same way I treat  
TKD's use of "perfective" and "adverbial", and not pay attention to  
any baggage it carries from its otherwise established usage.

-- ghunchu'wI'





Back to archive top level