tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 18 17:11:28 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
• Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:09:55 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

ja' Voragh:

>> Klingon word:   len
>> Part of Speech: noun
>> Definition:     recess, break
>
> Never used in canon.
>
> Related nouns:
>
> {lenHom} "short break" CK

Why is this given special status as a "related noun" instead of just  
being considered a simple example of the noun bearing a suffix?

• References:
  • Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: QapHa''a' jabbI'IDghom?
• Next by Date: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
• Next by thread: povam wanI' Daj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level