tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 12 21:32:15 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'

QeS 'utlh ([email protected])



mujuSbogh Sojmey vIlegh vIneHmo' wa'wen QInmey vIlaDtaH.

mu'tlhegh {nuqDaq 'oH puchpa''e'?} lubopbogh QIn vIlaD, 'ej Voragh wa'
QInDaq mu'tlheghvam vItu':

jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
I'm lost. TKD

chay' bopoj? vIpoj 'e' vInID 'ach Hatlaw'. mu'tlheghHom wa'DIch
'ay' 'oHchugh {naDev}'e', Hat (mu'tlhegh bI'reSDaq poHmey Daqmey je
perbogh DIp lulo'nISlu'), 'ej mu'tlheghHom cha'DIch 'ay' 'oHchugh, Hat
je (KCDDaq mu'tlhegh {Dajatlhbogh vIyajbe'} wIghaj, 'ach Soj DIp'e'
ghajnIS mojaq {-bogh} lulo'bogh wotmey roD net Qublaw').

chay' pojnISlu'?

SKI: QeS 'utlh is puzzled about the TKD sentence {jIHtaHbogh naDev
vISovbe'}. No matter which clause {naDev} is parsed into, it seems to
be illegal, unless it's further evidence for headless relative clauses.

QeS 'utlh
tlhIngan Hol yejHaD pab po'wI'
(Grammarian of the Klingon Language Institute)


not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' ngo' je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
- Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh

_________________________________________________________________
Overpaid or Underpaid? Check our comprehensive Salary Centre
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent%2Emycareer%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fsalary%2Dcentre%3Fs%5Fcid%3D595810&_t=766724125&_r=Hotmail_Email_Tagline_MyCareer_Oct07&_m=EXT




Back to archive top level