tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Aug 18 12:23:57 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)

Agnieszka Solska ([email protected])

• From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 19:19:50 +0000
• Bcc:
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

>If I'm following this correctly, this is what I understand:
>
>Last year at qep'a', a word was somewhat revelaed <'elI'jaH> unexpected 
>guest.

bIyajchu'.

>(But no one brought it up on the list for some reason)

tetlhDaq mu' chu'  DI'ang neHbe'law'  'angghal.  HolQeDDaq neH mu' chu'  
lu'anglu' neH ghaH.
Do'Ha' qaStaHvIS poH nI' narghbe' HolQeD 'ej  mu' <'elI'jaH> luSovbe'taH 
tlhIngan Hol HaDwI'pu'.

>This year a more public revelation was for <'el'I'jaH> uninvited guest.

wanI'vam  vIqawbe' jIH.  mu'  <'el'I'jaH>  'anglu'DI'  jIDachba'.

>And now we're debating the <'>.
>
>What if they're both correct?

DuH ghu'vam.

>What if they're two different (but very similiar) words?

DuH je ghu'vam.. bIlughchugh vaj cha'  mu'mey chu' DIghaj.

>Oh, and does anyone else have a hidden word that Okrand wrote in their 
>notebook?

latlh mu' vIghajbe' jIH.

'ISqu'

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
    • From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: qoy' (verb)
• Previous by thread: Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Next by thread: Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level