tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 17 20:01:31 2007
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
- From: naHQun <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: mu' chu' - 'el'I'jaH (?)
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:57:25 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=quJhPMpI0/NK6Zbf32NYqVmOxP8NpjqqelsQMr1c6KQA2NZuldGzCl4j4n8nabvSx7nOnSPq/V57kGmTarE+OdCZXYE+LyumMKginyd6JWx5OTbEffT06BNwIQ/UEWgu2QUVN8uSAy5lfRl8AI0kr3YhLbDlOC1gkCN19obB0bI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DoRLd/Wprk8idDz6/4ThTMpwAcHe4QTO4+ved3sZ7mDz6H1F55xGA2fiALxfSy83v6MyAUDZ8vzYmJTNaCLzHg6YTrqnIYXfQk1zh39xc646dHSuHiN/rafdZQWTW75GtTBGDY1LMbded24qwXln9MjCc23RYPV69BR31MDsKY0=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
If I'm following this correctly, this is what I understand:
Last year at qep'a', a word was somewhat revelaed <'elI'jaH> unexpected guest.
(But no one brought it up on the list for some reason)
This year a more public revelation was for <'el'I'jaH> uninvited guest.
And now we're debating the <'>.
What if they're both correct?
What if they're two different (but very similiar) words?
~naHQun
Oh, and does anyone else have a hidden word that Okrand wrote in their notebook?
--
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=508314975
http://www.myspace.com/naHQun
http://www.angelfire.com/tx4/purpleelaphants/
Can that which is unsavoury be eaten without salt? or is there any
taste in the white of an egg?
Job 6:6