tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 29 22:27:21 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol

Philip Newton ([email protected])

• From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
• Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:26:55 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mAypspSvz+Nlbya1iSVhaioyW/zHy/C25AA58nQN9Ijq1ttNzAVzuqJEHfytPjYQmXWhdnjfF3hXOc0vE1qqosXtGQdhPiTaE7eMUB8h1BKjiJB5JtnvlScMlzJ0FLhsy34Rdw1YPqx8IJM4cVrXjwQnI9BTiRiVkxZX613tTaw=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

On 1/30/06, naHQun <[email protected]> wrote:
> -be', -Qo', and -Ha' are all rovers. As far as I know,
> you can't use more than one same-type verb suffix. Can you?

I don't remember having seen anything definitive, but always assumed
that you could not only use multiple rovers on one verb, you could
even use the same rover multiple times, at least for {-be'} ... in
things such as, say, {jIHeghbe'qangbe'} "I am not ready not to die".
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 5241.55

• References:
  • Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
    • From: "naHQun" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: meyrI'Daq 'oHtaH gho'e'
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon phonotactics (was Re: Klingon at the Thanksgiving table - A month la
• Previous by thread: Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
• Next by thread: Re: -be' or -Qo'? I forget what the acronym was for the front... lol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level