tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 15 08:20:23 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: choq vs. toD vs pol

Lieven Litaer ([email protected])

• From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: choq vs. toD vs pol
• Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:20:09 +0100 (MET)
• References: <[email protected]>

Thanks for your advice.
I try to understand, but I don't :-/

> I understand it to mean "stow, put away", 

So do I.

> Try {ngaDmoH}.  It's a farly literal translation of the actual word,  

Really? "Cause to be balanced"? This sounds like flying a spaceship, but not
take your luggage. HIchuH!

> and could refer to either affixing something well to a backpack or to  
> putting it carefully in storage.

By the way, this word makes me struggle too: backpack/rucksack.
Any suggestions? Someone? Anyone?
luchngaSwI' and tepqengwI' have been the closest I could find, but not very
apprpriate...

Thanks,
  Quvar.

-- 
DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert:
GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: choq vs. toD vs pol
    • From: voan <[email protected]>
  • Re: choq vs. toD vs pol
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: choq vs. toD vs pol
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: easy question
• Next by Date: 'e' wab je vIQoy
• Previous by thread: Re: choq vs. toD vs pol
• Next by thread: Re: choq vs. toD vs pol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level