tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 30 19:32:21 2006

Re: par' vs. muS?

From: naHQun <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: par' vs. muS?
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:31:59 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DuknvMIwwu8IK40o2O9F5Bx06W/LBvbzoFr++v5E8CNZDFOEQtLH9uL3MQbYPHjpimmKwsuR6fBoIPolHDo9WxHdwXWzlRwczGkCLRS/UHZ+BGaIgOt3H0f1+ibIaT5t+0b2GCg33q0u/TfLCsVo9EqfeHFkCtArJR79VTeL4/A=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

There's a Qo'noS QonoS article about bang pongmey
/QQ/QQ0402.html

It's the second article, aptly named {bangoy} by 'ISqu'

~naHQun

References:
- Re: par' vs. muS?
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Re: par' vs. muS?
  - From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>
- Re: par' vs. muS?
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>