tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 27 21:48:15 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: Stovokor

DloraH ([email protected])

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: Stovokor
• Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:47:50 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AcZqfjoc8jOiMZdOTg2YS68TrYZJNwAAEDpA

>> > is it "Stovoqor", something 
>> > else, or has it yet to have a 
>> > cannon example?
>> 
>> It can't be *Stovoqor because of the CCV construction.
>> The only other spelling that I remember seeing is in "Diplomatic
>> Implausibility".
>> Suto'vo'qor
>> Pg248 states that Okrand vetted the glossary.
>> If /Suto'vo'qor/ is not from MO, would the auther have known 
>> to re-write
>> stovokor into a proper CVC format?
>> 
>> 
>> DloraH
> 
> 
> 
>   
> Then theoretically, they still might not have a proper word 
> for heaven... lol

"They" (klingons) DO have a proper word.
Us humans studying their language... that's different.


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Stovokor
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: Stovokor
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Stovokor
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: Suq (verb)
• Previous by thread: RE: Stovokor
• Next by thread: Re: Stovokor
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level