tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 22 10:05:59 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
- From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=w1ccOvUO0fahcFk8zVeD8llbs55qvtJyzkociGmJ0Th8a5BB8YTXBdK5cWEYbcMvZimqHeh9E4Py+7bBhZagff3Vu475tk9iBlZOAgho72qoLYqnYPlauH07gfrv1cBgzyF01rXWe5Ql81dEhORPPIUEHkmF709DKGXC+9UEd8w= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Alan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: ja' Shane MiQogh:
> ...But to "love" one another is alone an abused concept. parHa'qu'
> would fit better. Though if you mean all forms of the english love,
> i'd be intrested to see how you interpret it.
English "love" has a multitude of meanings. Each can be carried by a
different word or phrase in Klingon. I would interpret it as context
dictates.
-- ghunchu'wI'
The real question would be, which meaning of love would one see correct for muSHa'?
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.