tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 13 07:06:30 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: mangpu' or negh?
- From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: mangpu' or negh?
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:06:09 +1000
- Bcc:
ghItlhpu' lay'tel SIvten, ja':
>It could still be written as a separate word. Writing often has little
>connection with the underlying morphemes.
teHchu'. 'ach Hol ghItlhlu'bogh bopbe' Shane QIn; Hol jatlhlu'bogh bop, 'ej
QInDaj vIlaDDI', Hol ghItlhlu'bogh buSHa' 'e' Hech 'e' vIHar. yIlaDqa':
ja' Shane MiQogh, ja':
>it's safe to say that if it wasn't for how we write/type
>the words suffixes might be considered as separate words,
Hol ghItlhlu'bogh qelbe'ba'.
QeS 'utlh
tlhIngan Hol yejHaD pabpo' / Grammarian of the Klingon Language Institute
not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' ngo' je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
- Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh
_________________________________________________________________
Search for local singles online @ Lavalife - Click here
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D21550&_t=21550&_r=endtext&_m=EXT