tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 01 15:46:35 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
- From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 15:46:21 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bgxINHQicdxpDfvZ25IiO0Wol+nZ7EsYKEEjB0d/BKt5kEebshGUj23QdUsi7MOkd+hseh/wJQkwVZLs+8gKYm6EnzLf6qUs8mgcoR48jn7p2zxaD0Kug2r1IAav0HhsjsfQa3nTkzx/7pcBLL9/VuoIduDWRdAJ2ERtcYje0xo= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
From what i've heard, the only star trek based language is Klingon. Who developed the vulcan language and when?
[email protected] wrote: In a message dated 4/1/2006 5:41:50 PM Central Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
> Actually, vulcan (even though it's not a language) dosn't have any vowels.
> Thus why spock's name is considered unpronouncable. Theoretically then,
> Sarak would be Srk. Though, there is no vulcan language. Only Klingon.
>
Of course there is a Vulcan language. And it has vowels. Why would you say
otherwise?
lay'tel SIvten
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger?s low PC-to-Phone call rates.