tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 18 06:01:12 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: targhmey

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: targhmey
• Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:00:55 EDT

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 10/17/2005 6:37:39 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> Must I remind you *again* of the counterexamples from TKD?
> 
>    nuqDaq 'oH Qe' QaQ'e'
>    nuqDaq 'oH puchpa''e'
> 
> It's NOT a rule.
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI'
> 

And even if it *is* a rule, albeit unwritten, it still has canon exceptions.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: targhmey
    • From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: laj (noun)
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: laj (noun)
• Previous by thread: Re: targhmey
• Next by thread: Re: targhmey
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level