tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Oct 16 19:37:30 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: targhmey

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: targhmey
• Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:37:15 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' naHQun:

> {nuqDaq 'oH targh'e'?}
> {bIQtIqDaq 'oH'a'?}
> {bIQtIqDaq 'oH'a' targh'e'?} ??

maj.  I'd suggest putting {-taH} on the pronoun/verb, to emphasize  
that the location is a continuing thing rather than a simple fact of  
being.  That seems to be the conventional thing to do when using  
pronouns to indicate "be at a place".

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: targhmey
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: targhmey
    • From: "naHQun" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ghorgh maHIv?
• Next by Date: RE: ghorgh maHIv?
• Previous by thread: Re: targhmey
• Next by thread: Re: targhmey
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level