tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 22 18:37:27 2005
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Subtle shadings of "then": Okrand's error ?
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Subtle shadings of "then": Okrand's error ?
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 21:37:11 EDT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 5/22/2005 7:39:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
> Finally, that little matter of {Daj mugh}. ghunchu'wI' is correct: this was
> an intentional error that I used for emphasis. A similar construct has been
> attested in canon (i.e. {wIj jup} "friend mine" - KGT p.40), although on
> rereading, that might be restricted to addressing people.
QInvam vIHevpa', ngoDvam vISovbe'.
mojaq lo'vam vIlajtaHvIS, Hujlaw'qu' 'oH.
lay'tel SIvten