tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 22 18:37:27 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Subtle shadings of "then": Okrand's error ?

MorphemeAddict ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 5/22/2005 7:39:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> Finally, that little matter of {Daj mugh}. ghunchu'wI' is correct: this was 
> an intentional error that I used for emphasis. A similar construct has been 
> attested in canon (i.e. {wIj jup} "friend mine" - KGT p.40), although on 
> rereading, that might be restricted to addressing people.


QInvam vIHevpa', ngoDvam vISovbe'.  
mojaq lo'vam vIlajtaHvIS, Hujlaw'qu' 'oH.  
lay'tel SIvten






Back to archive top level