tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 10 04:59:47 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

motlhnISqa'moH

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: motlhnISqa'moH
• Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:59:01 EDT

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 6/10/2005 7:03:49 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> Would the following word be understandable?
> " motlhnISqa'moH "
> 
> It is supposed to be used in that sentence:
> 
> *Firefox yIlo'. HTML motlhnISqa'moH
> 
> It is supposed to mean "Because HTML needs to become a standard again."
> 
<motlhnISqa'mo' HTML> yInID.

You have 'become' in the English, but that would likely involve {-choH}, the 
other type-3 verb suffix along with {-qa'}, which you've already used.  I also 
changed {-moH} (VS4: cause to) to {-mo'} (VS9: because).  And the subject, 
HTML, comes after the verb.

yajlaH'a' vay'?  chaq, 'ach vIyajbe' jIH.  'ach Dochmey law' vIyajbe'.

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: 'double' negative
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: to'waQ (noun)
• Previous by thread: 'double' negative
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: tungHa' (verb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level