tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 18 05:38:59 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: comparative as question

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: comparative as question
• Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:38:42 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' QeS lagh:

> Or perhaps {tIntaHghach'e' raS nIv yIngu'} "as for largeness,  
> identify the
> superior table"? Would that work?

I'm not very comfortable with this use of {-'e'}.  It seems sloppy.   
But now that you've suggested it:

raSvam'e' raSvetlh'e' je, nuq tIn law' latlh tIn puS?

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: comparative as question
    • From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: bIQ'a' wIghoSchugh...
• Next by Date: Re: bIQ'a' wIghoSchugh...
• Previous by thread: Re: comparative as question
• Next by thread: Re: comparative as question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level