tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 18 07:38:33 2005
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "wamwI' "
- From: bob mcfaddin <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: "wamwI' "
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:37:54 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=aG0MN9yejBY6j11qHtp1pl5brjiTFsRodVaX4o6hGdwG2KYJ8Xxy2rb2nctu2nNdogrymN+lrn+0EYtZ6IYlVk2PpjX+XfGQmJUPq2cE/Uw6lC5j6WhUDLJ0KVbVnThJXyIO8fJbIhaOxlxb/d7311827FQnMm73meYDRukasx0= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
QeS lagh <[email protected]> wrote:
ghItlhpu' juDmoS:
>I still haven't heard from anyone...qetHa' a comb of qet (run, jog) and
>-Ha' (undo) used if something is done wrongly...for someone/something to
>"misrun" as a description of "stumble"...that is to say, misstep while
>running without falling down. Does this work ?
I had no problem understanding it. {qetHa'} is OK here, and I'd say one of
the better options.
>Is there a better way to say it?
I can't think of many; lay'SIv's idea {tlhoS pum} "it almost falls" is
another option. But to be honest, I think you've already found the word that
expresses what you're looking for. {qetHa'} is fine IMO.
Savan,
QeS lagh
taghwI' pabpo' / Beginners' Grammarian
Holvam vIyajbej 'e' jItaghqu'taH mughIj je.
jajvam lururbogh jajmey'e' lutu'lu' muja'ta' SoSoywI'
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.