tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 06 04:36:23 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: live richly

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: live richly
• Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:35:42 EST

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 12/5/2005 5:02:22 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> ghItlhpu' lay'tel SIvten, ja':
> >       je''eghmeH yIyIn!
> >       Live to enrich yourself!
> 
> The general concept is pretty good, but as Voragh said, one should probably 
> use {bIje''eghmeH} instead of {je''eghmeH}: it is definitely yourself that 
> you are enriching, so you should say so.
> 
> The argument about prefixes with {-meH} clauses has been had (many times!) 
> before, but I stand firm on my position that {-meH} clauses modifying verbs 
> should take appropriate pronominal prefixes.
> 
> 

jIQochbe'.  'ach vIlIj.  tlhIngan Hol vIlo'meH jIqeqnIS.  

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: nIHwI' (noun)
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: nIHwI' (noun)
• Previous by thread: Re: live richly
• Next by thread: Re: live richly
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level