tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 24 08:56:14 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:56:04 -0400 (EDT)
- User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6
> I take a broad view of the comment "capable of using language":
> ...
> It could include an intelligent (i.e., sentient/self-willed) computer.
I notice that a lot of people forget the word "beings".
My dictionary says "beings capable of using language". That rules out
computers and such.
> not only do I use it for all forms of sentient beings who can (and do)
> use language, but I also use it for all of those beings who belong to
> groups who *normally* or *typically* can speak, thus including deaf/mute
> people, mentally retarded people, babies and infants, the ghosts of
> dead people (but not usually their corpses).
And this is how it is suppose to be used, per a discussion with MO.
(I believe that was in 1998)
DloraH