tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 15 16:49:45 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: ngeD/nap

Lieven L. Litaer ([email protected])

• From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: ngeD/nap
• Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:49:49 +0200
• In-reply-to: <000701c49b62$29d40e80$6501a8c0@SENARA>
• Organization: qepHom.de
• References: <000701c49b62$29d40e80$6501a8c0@SENARA>
• User-agent: Opera7.11/Win32 M2 build 2887

ghItlh Regina Reusser:

> I've got some problems to understand the difference between "easy" and
> "simple". When I translate these words into german, both mean 
> "einfach"...

I don't know where it comes from, but my notes give the following:

simple v. 1. (be simple) nap; 2. (easy to do, perform, or achieve) ngeD.

> Well, but perhaps my translation program is not the best (hahaha)...

Pretty soon my german-Klingon dictionary will be finished. There are really 
just a handful words missing.

einfach v. 1. (simpel, nicht kompliziert) nap;
2. (leicht zu tun oder zu erledigen) ngeD.

Quvar.
www.qepHom.de

• References:
  • ngeD/nap
    • From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: BBC E-mail: German radio starts Klingon service
• Next by Date: lo' law'
• Previous by thread: Re: ngeD/nap
• Next by thread: Re: ngeD/nap
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level