tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 09 04:47:58 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: yuch
- From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: yuch
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 22:46:57 +1000
- Bcc:
jIghItlhpu':
>While I don't think there's any canon to support it, using {qIjbogh yuch
>nap} "simple chocolate which is black" seems to be legal as well.
>
>QeS lagh
jang lay'tel SIvten:
>chaq teHbe' qatlh 'e' DaQub?
<Qochbe'bogh <canon>'e' tu'lu'be'> jIjatlh; <teHbe' 'e' vIHar>
jIjatlhbe'qu'pu'. {{:)
I actually do think this is grammatical Klingon. It doesn't violate any
rules that we're given in TKD. There's just no sentence like this in Klingon
canon, which is the caveat I was giving Senara.
Savan.
QeS lagh
not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' qan je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
- Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh
_________________________________________________________________
SEEK: Now with over 50,000 dream jobs! Click here:
http://ninemsn.seek.com.au?hotmail